Bias in the classroom

Bias in the classroom refers to the presence of unfair or prejudiced attitudes, behaviours, or practices that can negatively impact students’ learning experiences and outcomes. Bias can manifest in various forms, including but not limited to: teacher bias, curriculum bias, assessment bias, micro-aggressions, and discipline disparities. In the present article, we will have an overview of these forms of bias as well as suggest several strategies to address them.

Teacher Bias: Teachers, like all individuals, may hold unconscious biases that affect their interactions with students. These biases can be related to race, gender, socio-economic status, disability, or other characteristics. For example, a teacher might unintentionally give more attention or opportunities to students who fit their preconceived notions of a “model student.”

Curriculum Bias: The curriculum and instructional materials used in the classroom can reflect biases in terms of what is included, how it is presented, and whose perspectives are represented. For instance, history textbooks may omit important contributions of marginalised groups or present a Eurocentric view of historical events.

Assessment Bias: Standardised tests and assessments can contain biased content or formats that disadvantage certain groups of students. This can result in unfair evaluation and potentially lower academic achievement for affected students.

Micro-aggressions: Micro-aggressions are subtle, often unintentional comments or actions that convey bias or stereotypes. These can create a hostile or unwelcoming classroom environment for targeted students.

Discipline Disparities: Bias can also affect disciplinary actions in the classroom. Students from marginalised backgrounds may be disproportionately punished or labelled as “troublemakers” due to teacher bias.

          Addressing bias in the classroom is essential for creating an inclusive and equitable learning environment. Here are some strategies to mitigate bias:

Cultivate Self-Awareness: Teachers should reflect on their own biases and work to become aware of them. Implicit bias training can be helpful in this regard.

Diverse Representation: Teachers should ensure that the curriculum and classroom materials reflect a diversity of voices, perspectives, and experiences. This helps students see themselves in the content and learn about different cultures and backgrounds.

Inclusive Teaching Practices: It is imperative that educationalists use inclusive teaching methods that accommodate different learning styles and abilities. This may involve offering various ways for students to demonstrate their knowledge and providing additional support when needed.

Cultural Competence: Teachers should develop cultural competence to better understand and respect the cultures and backgrounds of their students. This can help build positive relationships and avoid cultural misunderstandings.

Micro-aggressions need to be addressed: Teachers must make sure to create a classroom culture where micro-aggressions are not tolerated. They should teach students about the impact of micro-aggressions and how to address them.

Fair Assessment: The education system must see to it that assessments are fair and free from bias. Teachers should consider alternative assessment methods that are more inclusive and reflective of students’ abilities.

Equitable Discipline: Educationists must implement discipline policies that are fair and unbiased, while focusing on restorative practices that emphasise learning and growth rather than punitive measures.

Professional Development: Schools should provide ongoing professional development opportunities for teachers and staff to learn about and address bias and discrimination.

          It is important to recognise that addressing bias in the classroom is an ongoing process that requires commitment on the part of educators, administrators, and the broader school community in order to create a truly inclusive and equitable learning environment for all students.


  •        Aronson, J., Steele, C. M., & Salinas, M. F. (1998). The Stereotype Threat: Contending and Coping with Unseen Academic Identity. In J. M. Reinisch, L. A. Rosenblum, & S. A. Sanders (Eds.), Masculinity/femininity, pp. 181-196. American Psychological Association.
  •        Banks, J. A. (2013). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (9th ed., pp. 3-29). Wiley.
  •        Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. The New Press.
  •        Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106-116.
  •        Howard, T. C. (2010). Why race and culture matter in schools: Closing the achievement gap in America's classrooms. Teachers College Press.
  •        Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
  •        Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271-286.
  •        Tatum, B. D. (2003). "Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?" And Other Conversations about Race: A Psychologist Explains the Development of Racial Identity. Basic Books.
  •        Valencia, R. R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.
  •        Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20-32.


Dimitris Thanasoulas

Dimitris Thanasoulas

Teacher, translator, ELT materials writer/editor, linguist, life coach and psychotherapist (Logotherapist)